ADVERTISEMENT
Traffic:   18 Incidents
Weather: 28°F Go
  07:43pm CST, 02/09/10
Search:    wbbm780.com  Web  Audio
Local News
Posted: Tuesday, 06 January 2009 6:30AM

Court Ruling Paves Way For More Red-Light Cameras



CHICAGO (STNG) - A federal appeals court has given the green light to red-light cameras that have pumped out more than a million Chicago tickets and generated $100 million in sorely-needed revenue since 2003.

The ruling by the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals preserves one of the city's few revenue sources not subject to the economic downturn -- and clears the way for a major expansion that will install cameras at more than 330 accident-prone Chicago intersections by 2012).

Rejecting the so-called "innocent owner's defense," the appellate court ruled that it is not a violation of equal protection or due process to issue $100 tickets to license plate holders, even though somebody else was driving the car caught on camera running a red light.

"Is it rational to fine the owner, rather than the driver? Certainly so. A camera can show reliably which cars and trucks go through red lights, but is less likely to show who was driving. That would make it easy for owners to point the finger at friends or children -- and essentially impossible for the city to prove otherwise," the ruling states.

"A system of photographic evidence reduces the costs of law enforcement and increases the proportion of all traffic offenses detected. These benefits can be achieved only if the owner is held responsible. This need not mean that the owner bears the economic loss. An owner can insist that the driver reimburse ... if he wants to use the car again (or maintain the friendship)."

Arizona-based Redflex Traffic Systems has installed 248 cameras at 123 accident-prone Chicago intersections since 2003, with 50 more intersections planned for 2009. The cameras have raised $94.5 million and reduced red-light running by 59 percent.

Ever since Chicago entered the Brave New World of Traffic Enforcement, City Hall has insisted that red-light cameras were more about safety than money.

The plaintiffs made the opposite claim. But, the Appellate Court rejected that argument as well.

"That the city's system raises revenue does not condemn it. Taxes -- whether on liquor or on running red lights -- are valid municipal endeavors. ... A fine does more than raise revenue: It also discourages the taxed activity. A system that simultaneously raises money and improves compliance with traffic laws has much to recommend it and cannot be called unconstitutionally whimsical," the ruling states.

Motorists caught on camera running red lights get a $100 ticket in the mail, along with digital photographs of the violation. They can also view the cold, hard evidence on line -- by typing in their license plate number, along with the citation and code number.

"We're pleased with the decision. We believed all along the program was legal and a valid enforcement tool," said Law Department spokeswoman Jennifer Hoyle.

She added, "If you lend your car to somebody and they use it solicit a prostitute, the vehicle is impounded. It doesn't matter whether the person using the vehicle was the owner of the car or not."


Copyright 2009 STNG Wire, The Chicago Sun-Times. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
 
 
01/06/2009 12:41PM
Need a buffer zone/time
Red light cameras need a buffer zone or buffer time so it only triggers if the light was red for 1/2 second before you reach the stop line or doesn't trigger unless red when you enter the PAVEMENT intersection.
01/06/2009 1:14PM
PJ Hoff
"Is it rational to fine the owner, rather than the driver? Certainly so. A camera can show reliably which cars and trucks go through red lights, but is less likely to show who was driving. That would make it easy for owners to point the finger at friends or children -- and essentially impossible for the city to prove otherwise," the ruling states." This is incredible! Have these people never heard of the United States Constitution!?
01/06/2009 9:21AM
Comment on this story.
Share your thoughts.
Title:
Comment:
Print Page Email This Page
Featured Audio

4:30pm News To Go For 2-9-10


Our 4:30 news block, taken off-air, plus the hottest interview from our Noon Business Hour.

MarketWatch Media Columnist, Jon Friedman


MarketWatch Media Columnist, Jon Friedman joins Sherman and Kris during the WBBM Noon Business Hour to discuss the big business of tiny bikinis for Sports Illustrated.

Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Covers '55-'10

Noon Business Hour 2-9-10 FULL SHOW


Join Sherman Kaplan and Kris Kridel as they discuss the economy and financial markets with some of the nation's top experts.

Eating Right For Feb 9 2010


Tips on living and eating healthy.

The Healthy Minute For February 9th


Resisting the overuse of antibiotics.
 
 
ADVERTISEMENT
 
 
Top News
AP

Ex-Peterson Co-Worker: I Was Asked To Kill Savio


A witness at Drew Peterson's hearsay hearing contends he was asked to kill the former Bolingbrook police sergeant's third wife but he turned the offer down.

Prius Giveaway At The Auto Show


Now, CTA riders have 2 reasons to allow extra time


Official: one good thing about serious snow


The candidate, the party and the case of the missing mink


 
 
Search: